Sounds cool, but I'd suggest using a similar convention for both antlr and stringtemplate so it'll be easier come v5 ;)
-- Scott ---------------------------------------- Scott Stanchfield http://javadude.com On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Terence Parr <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi. to avoid classes where antlr v3 and v4 have to coexist in a project, is > it ok if i use org.antlr.v4 as the root package? > > ST v4 is cool since it's org.stringtemplate.* old was > org.antlr.stringtemplate.* > > Ter > > List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest > Unsubscribe: > http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address > List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest Unsubscribe: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "il-antlr-interest" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/il-antlr-interest?hl=en.
