I guess you could use codegen.* for the tool instead, so you'd end up with org.antlr.runtime, org.antlr.codegen, etc.
-----Original Message----- From: Terence Parr [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Sunday, January 24, 2010 2:50 PM To: Sam Harwell Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [antlr-interest] org.antlr.v4.* ??? what does compiler mean here? Ter On Jan 24, 2010, at 12:47 PM, Sam Harwell wrote: > What about org.antlr.compiler.*? > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Terence Parr > Sent: Sunday, January 24, 2010 2:01 PM > To: [email protected] interest > Subject: [antlr-interest] org.antlr.v4.* ??? > > Hi. to avoid classes where antlr v3 and v4 have to coexist in a project, > is it ok if i use org.antlr.v4 as the root package? > > ST v4 is cool since it's org.stringtemplate.* old was > org.antlr.stringtemplate.* > > Ter > > List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest > Unsubscribe: > http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest Unsubscribe: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "il-antlr-interest" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/il-antlr-interest?hl=en.
