Sounds good. Normally I'd say use the same package names as before, but because you're doing a rewrite having a different package name is a good idea imho.
-- Scott ---------------------------------------- Scott Stanchfield http://javadude.com On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 3:14 PM, Terence Parr <[email protected]> wrote: > good point. so org.stringtemplate.v4.* and org.antlr.v4.* right? > > Ter > On Jan 24, 2010, at 12:11 PM, Scott Stanchfield wrote: > >> Sounds cool, but I'd suggest using a similar convention for both antlr >> and stringtemplate so it'll be easier come v5 ;) >> >> -- Scott > > List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest Unsubscribe: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "il-antlr-interest" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/il-antlr-interest?hl=en.
