On 16/02/12 16:39, Lewis John Mcgibbney wrote:
I agree with this Andy.
I'm in the process of updating the site and will ensure that everything is
up to scratch.
I would really like to see us moving towards an Any23-0.7.0 release VOTE
soon.
The one thing I am really puzzled about, is where we are actually using the
LGPL library in our code? I have also removed the dependency from the
pom.xml and my basic-crawler plugin tests fail, however looking at the test
cases there appears to be no direct link to the libraries!
It seems to be used by edu.uci.ics.crawler4j v2.6.1
I see on maven central there is a v3.0/3.1 (no 2.6.1).
3.1 does not have a declared dsiutils dependency - maybe it does not
need it now.
So has 2.6.1 been deployed as a one off into a repo?
...
http://any23.googlecode.com/svn/repo-ext/edu/uci/ics/crawler4j/2.6.1/
POM is just:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<project xsi:schemaLocation="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0
http://maven.apache.org/xsd/maven-4.0.0.xsd";
xmlns="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0";
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";>
<modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion>
<groupId>edu.uci.ics</groupId>
<artifactId>crawler4j</artifactId>
<version>2.6.1</version>
</project>
http://any23.googlecode.com/svn/repo-ext/it/unimi/dsi/dsiutils/2.0.1/
so it's the reliance on repo a.g.c/svn/repo-ext
Andy
Lewis
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Andy Seaborne<[email protected]> wrote:
On 12/02/12 19:06, Simone Tripodi wrote:
Hi Andy!
ANY23-37 is a blocker for releasing basic-crawler because it is a legal
matter.
+1, without any doubt!
-Simo
So it seems that ANY23-37 requires the code to be removed from an Apache
release - dsiutils is unlikely to be relicensed with a compatible license.
That may turn out to be a large chunk of work.
Is there a useful subset of any23 that can be released without
basic-crawler? Doing a release of something-not-everything is still worth
doing for the process.
If there is, I'd suggest doing a release-of-something and letting
basic-crawler catch up.
Andy
