Hi Andy, I'm kinda loosing the track with this one. Working on this comment
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:57 PM, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote: > > It seems to be used by edu.uci.ics.crawler4j v2.6.1 > > I see on maven central there is a v3.0/3.1 (no 2.6.1). > 3.1 does not have a declared dsiutils dependency - maybe it does not need > it now. > > > I've patched any23 to nearly work with Crawler4j 3.3. I get one compile error but I think submitting the patch now under ANY23-27 is the best thing as it gives us an opportunity to strike whilst the iron is hot. So please see the patch on the issue. As I've not been able to get this to compile yet, I can't declare whether we can completely drop the offending LGPL library. One thing which I think it worth noting, is that when I contacted Sebastiano yday he mentioned {qt} My guess is Bloom filters. You can reimplement them in a day, or substitute then with a LongOpenHashSet of 64-bit signatures. {qt} Is this possibly why we rely upon DSIutils? Anyway, hopefully the former comes to fruition and crawler4j doesn't need to rely upon DSIutils anymore... (ahem). Here's to hoping :0) Lewis
