On 09/16/2011 03:37 AM, Alexandre Chapellon wrote: > Anybody tried lastest aoe driver (77) with kernel 3.0? > If so what was the result?
Based on the message http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1036050 I'd say that this trivial patch against aoe6-77 might work for 3.x. I didn't tested it (just compiled ) and did not perform any consequence analysis, sorry. --- aoechr.c 2011-09-16 15:19:39.000000000 -0700 +++ aoechr.c 2011-09-16 15:19:55.000000000 -0700 @@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ #include <linux/blkdev.h> #include <linux/init.h> #include <linux/delay.h> -#include <linux/smp_lock.h> #include <linux/slab.h> +#include <linux/mutex.h> #include "aoe.h" enum { @@ -36,6 +36,8 @@ char *msg; }; +static DEFINE_MUTEX(aoechr_mutex); + /* A ring buffer of error messages, to be read through * "/dev/etherd/err". When no messages are present, * readers will block waiting for messages to appear. @@ -182,16 +184,16 @@ { int n, i; - lock_kernel(); + mutex_lock(&aoechr_mutex); n = MINOR(inode->i_rdev); filp->private_data = (void *) (unsigned long) n; for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(chardevs); ++i) if (chardevs[i].minor == n) { - unlock_kernel(); + mutex_unlock(&aoechr_mutex); return 0; } - unlock_kernel(); + mutex_unlock(&aoechr_mutex); return -EINVAL; } ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ BlackBerry® DevCon Americas, Oct. 18-20, San Francisco, CA http://p.sf.net/sfu/rim-devcon-copy2 _______________________________________________ Aoetools-discuss mailing list Aoetools-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/aoetools-discuss
