Not sure but normally on my servers the connections come and go quickly enough to not have more than a couple showing connected in netstat. (With the exception of a couple of slow pages)
I'm wondering if the 24 connected is related to the 25 MaxBusy. On Wednesday 10 April 2002 02:16 pm, you wrote: > Wait, I take that back. Right now there are 42 nsd processes running but > only 24 showing up as connected in netstat. So what does that mean? > > janine > > On 4/10/02 3:15 PM, "David Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Does "netstat -np" still show their tcpip connection as open? > > > > On Wednesday 10 April 2002 01:52 pm, you wrote: > >> Of course, it's not going to be *that* simple... > >> > >> There seem to be two different symptoms here. One is that the server > >> just stops responding, even though it does not have a huge number of > >> thread going and nothing is visibly wrong. That seems to have gone away > >> with Rob's LD_ASSUME_KERNEL idea. > >> > >> The other is that the number of threads rises to the max, which is 100, > >> and then people start queueing up and getting the "site busy" message. > >> This seems to happen "all of a sudden". The site's not *that* busy; > >> there are only 59,307 lines in the access log for today so far, so it > >> seems unlikely to me that all 100 threads are actually in use at once. > >> This one is still happening. > >> > >> So, any other ideas would be welcome! > >> > >> janine > >> > >> On 4/10/02 2:08 PM, "Janine Sisk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> You know, I really think Rob is on to something here. Not only is the > >>> number of threads not increasing so fast, I just saw it go *down* by > >>> one for the first time. And the site has not hiccuped since I made > >>> this change, though it is still being restarted every 30 minutes so > >>> that's not quite the accomplishment it sounds like. > >>> > >>> I will report back again after I've given this a good trial. > >>> > >>> janine > >>> > >>> On 4/10/02 1:00 PM, "Rob Mayoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>> +---------- On Apr 10, Lamar Owen said: > >>>>> 7.2's glibc is so much newer than 6.2's that the linkage may be > >>>>> broken. Binaries linked/compiled under 6.2 usually do _not_ work > >>>>> properly on 7.2. Even with the compat libraries installed. The > >>>>> reason seems to be kernel 2.4. > >>>> > >>>> To use some JVMs on 2.4, you have to set LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.2.5. > >>>> Maybe setting it will help with AOLserver 2.3.3. > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Janine Sisk > >>> President/CEO > >>> furfly.net, LLC > >>> Mont Vernon, NH > >>> Phone: 603-672-1122
