It seems there are *always* 24 nsd processes connected, no matter how many are really running.
BTW, a few of these are probably from different processes; there are two other nsds running on this system. Only this one is running away like this, though. janine On 4/10/02 3:49 PM, "David Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Not sure but normally on my servers the connections come and go quickly > enough to not have more than a couple showing connected in netstat. (With > the exception of a couple of slow pages) > > I'm wondering if the 24 connected is related to the 25 MaxBusy. > > On Wednesday 10 April 2002 02:16 pm, you wrote: >> Wait, I take that back. Right now there are 42 nsd processes running but >> only 24 showing up as connected in netstat. So what does that mean? >> >> janine >> >> On 4/10/02 3:15 PM, "David Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Does "netstat -np" still show their tcpip connection as open? >>> >>> On Wednesday 10 April 2002 01:52 pm, you wrote: >>>> Of course, it's not going to be *that* simple... >>>> >>>> There seem to be two different symptoms here. One is that the server >>>> just stops responding, even though it does not have a huge number of >>>> thread going and nothing is visibly wrong. That seems to have gone away >>>> with Rob's LD_ASSUME_KERNEL idea. >>>> >>>> The other is that the number of threads rises to the max, which is 100, >>>> and then people start queueing up and getting the "site busy" message. >>>> This seems to happen "all of a sudden". The site's not *that* busy; >>>> there are only 59,307 lines in the access log for today so far, so it >>>> seems unlikely to me that all 100 threads are actually in use at once. >>>> This one is still happening. >>>> >>>> So, any other ideas would be welcome! >>>> >>>> janine >>>> >>>> On 4/10/02 2:08 PM, "Janine Sisk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>> You know, I really think Rob is on to something here. Not only is the >>>>> number of threads not increasing so fast, I just saw it go *down* by >>>>> one for the first time. And the site has not hiccuped since I made >>>>> this change, though it is still being restarted every 30 minutes so >>>>> that's not quite the accomplishment it sounds like. >>>>> >>>>> I will report back again after I've given this a good trial. >>>>> >>>>> janine >>>>> >>>>> On 4/10/02 1:00 PM, "Rob Mayoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>>> +---------- On Apr 10, Lamar Owen said: >>>>>>> 7.2's glibc is so much newer than 6.2's that the linkage may be >>>>>>> broken. Binaries linked/compiled under 6.2 usually do _not_ work >>>>>>> properly on 7.2. Even with the compat libraries installed. The >>>>>>> reason seems to be kernel 2.4. >>>>>> >>>>>> To use some JVMs on 2.4, you have to set LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.2.5. >>>>>> Maybe setting it will help with AOLserver 2.3.3. >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Janine Sisk >>>>> President/CEO >>>>> furfly.net, LLC >>>>> Mont Vernon, NH >>>>> Phone: 603-672-1122 > -- Janine Sisk President/CEO furfly.net, LLC Mont Vernon, NH Phone: 603-672-1122
