First, belated congratulations. Dossy! (I'm just catching up on my
email from yesterday.)
On Fri, 21 May 2004 09:36:48 +0200
Dani�l Mantione <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - Perhaps ridiculous, but it happened several times that I had to
> explain to some people that AOLserver was open-source. They had made
> some quick conclusion from the .com address.
Well, it wouldn't be a big deal or a big expense to grab the .org and
.net variants of the domain name, if that would make people feel more
comfortable. In fact, that might not be a bad idea anyway, for defensive
purposes. But see below...
> Technically:
>
> I think it is a huge mistake to host www.aolserver.com on Apache.
> www.aolserver.com should be a demonstration of the power of AOLserver.
> The pages should load instant an fast to demonstrate the performance.
The problem here is that www.aolserver.com is just an alias for
vhost.sourceforge.net. Since the site is actually hosted on SourceForge,
AOL haven't got control over what Web server is used. Reflecting on the
issues involved in migrating to a different host might give a little
insight into why Dossy said that moving back to an AOLserver is not at
the top of the priority heap, but takes a back seat to revamping the
site's content.
Cheers,
Bob
--
AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/
To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with the
body of "SIGNOFF AOLSERVER" in the email message. You can leave the Subject: field of
your email blank.
