On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 02:54, Jeff Hobbs wrote: > Mat Kovach wrote: > > I am not, I am suggesting moving the main website off sourceforge > > but keeping cvs and downloads on sourceforge. > > Ah, all well and good
Sorry, thought I had made that clear in my email. > >>>I can offer a home for the website with good connectivity at > >>>this time I can give up the bandwidth for the cvs and > >>>download areas. Also, I don't have any extra boxes lying > >> > >>What is your backup plan? What is your redundancy plan? These > >>are some of the critical background features that SF offers. > > > > What would you like the backup plan and redundancy to be? I > > Actually, I don't think this is a main worry, if we are > just talking the website. We can continue to maintain > the site in CVS at SF (as is done now), so the rebuilding > of the site in case of failure is quick. My point was > more for other things, like CVS or downloads, as SF has > RAID arrays and dsitributed download servers that handle > that. I was hoping that it was just a CSV and Download issue and I am glad we have that cleared up. > > My thought of offering to host the site was not to dismiss > > sourceforge, I use CVS and downloads @sourceforge for serveral > > projects (include uptime and myturl). I just thought that having > > aolserver.com on AOLserver might be a good PR move and help show case > > some of the power of AOLserver. > > I agree, that just wasn't clear from your first message. > That's why tcl.tk is not hosted by SF, but rather hosted > on ActiveState hardware using tclhttpd. I will discuss this with Dossy offline and see what can be worked out. ~mek -- AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/ To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with the body of "SIGNOFF AOLSERVER" in the email message. You can leave the Subject: field of your email blank.
