On 2005.08.24, Olaf Mersmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm still undecided on weather to bundle nsopenssl + openssl or nsnss > + nspr and nss. I have not worked with euther so your opions for or > against either would be appreciated.
I have nothing against nsnss and NSPR/NSS, but I've spent a lot of time working with/on nsopenssl and OpenSSL, and would appreciate more eyeballs on the combo. Of course, maybe this is foolish: if nsnss and NSPR/NSS are rock solid and don't have all the (annoying) problems that nsopenssl has, maybe we should just ditch nsopenssl entirely and go to nsnss. Any opinions from folks who have tried nsnss? > Another point I'm still unsure about is weather to ship stripped > libs and binaries No ... please don't. It makes debugging other people's problems much harder if they're running stripped binaries. > and exclude documentation (manpages etc.) or include > it. Include the documentation -- it can't possibly be contributing that much in terms of space, since it's all plaintext. > A simple kludge would be to provide a wrapper script to start nsd that > sets LD_LIBRARY_PATH accordingly, but this seems like a big kludge. It's absolutely not a kludge: matter of fact, I think Debian Linux requires that paths not be burned into binaries with -R so that they can be relocated with LD_LIBRARY_PATH. -- Dossy -- Dossy Shiobara [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://dossy.org/ Panoptic Computer Network http://panoptic.com/ "He realized the fastest way to change is to laugh at your own folly -- then you can let go and quickly move on." (p. 70) -- AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/ To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with the body of "SIGNOFF AOLSERVER" in the email message. You can leave the Subject: field of your email blank.
