Rick Gutleber wrote: > > 2) The biggest bang for our buck would be improving the Tcl language > > and the codebase available for it rather than bringing in another popular > > language. It took Rails to put Ruby on the map. What would our Rails be? > > > I would be careful to say "improve upon, or enchance the Tcl libraries" > rather than the language.
I mean improving the language as well. As Dossy said, there are a few things that could be added to the language that would "make the language geeks go 'ooh!'", and a few others that would just make life a little more powerful. This is the sort of stuff that most of us can't take as active a role in doing, but they would still make a big difference. > > 4) Who could sponsor AOLserver development apart from AOL? Does > > anyone know of anyone with a large deployment of AOLserver? > > > I think it would take no more than some web space and, at best, > subsidizing a full-time developer or three. My question is aimed at finding out who would have the resources and motivation to subsidize developers? -T. -- AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/ To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with the body of "SIGNOFF AOLSERVER" in the email message. You can leave the Subject: field of your email blank.
