Andrew, Maybe I should have said that I'll look at the issue, but not as a performance issue. The bug aspect may be simply allowing a timeout. Otherwise finding a solution would probably require a thread to say that it is going to sleep until a connection arrives. Then other threads can figure out if they can exit on timeout without pushing current below min.
On Monday 22 October 2007 07:48, Andrew Piskorski wrote: > On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 06:30:40AM -0700, Tom Jackson wrote: > > My only point here was that I'm going to stop looking at the timeout > > parameter, and timed out threads as an issue. If threads timeout, the > > number of threads in a threadpool will drop below minthreads, usually to > > zero. > > But isn't that a bug? If not, just what is "minthreads" supposed to > really mean? -- AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/ To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with the body of "SIGNOFF AOLSERVER" in the email message. You can leave the Subject: field of your email blank.
