While it is true that for plain proxing, pound is simpler and easier to
configure,
nginx scales better (e.g. when you have e.g. 1000+ concurrent connecitions)
and offers a large scale of modules etc. We switched from pound to nginx
two years ago, and the decision was right for us. While for pound, every
connection is a separate thread, nginx uses asynchronous connecitions
(+ configurable multiple threads).
best regards
-gustaf neumann
Alexey Pechnikov schrieb:
Hello!
В сообщении от Saturday 07 February 2009 06:00:39 Alex написал(а):
Apache for proxying????
nginx
nginx for proxing?!!
pound
Best regards, Alexey.
--
AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/
To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to
<lists...@listserv.aol.com> with the
body of "SIGNOFF AOLSERVER" in the email message. You can leave the Subject:
field of your email blank.
