Hello! В сообщении от Saturday 07 February 2009 15:45:48 Gustaf Neumann написал(а): > While it is true that for plain proxing, pound is simpler and easier to > configure, > nginx scales better (e.g. when you have e.g. 1000+ concurrent connecitions) > and offers a large scale of modules etc. We switched from pound to nginx > two years ago, and the decision was right for us. While for pound, every > connection is a separate thread, nginx uses asynchronous connecitions > (+ configurable multiple threads).
As I know nginx may expensive use hard drive and DDOS attack may to kill server. Pound is more secure because does not access the hard-disk and does verify http/https requests. But I didn't use pound with 1000+ concurrent connecitions. Best regards, Alexey. -- AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/ To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to <lists...@listserv.aol.com> with the body of "SIGNOFF AOLSERVER" in the email message. You can leave the Subject: field of your email blank.
