On Sun, 5 Nov 2000, Chris Pepper wrote:
>       It tripped my spell checker, and I couldn't tell what the 
> policy is (sounds like there isn't one yet).

Anyway, I committed the non-controversial part along with a few other
fixups to bring this more into line with the other docs.

By the way, I had no success with your patch.  For one thing, your mailer
had put in some line-breaks where there shouldn't have been any.  For
another thing, it looked like the indentation was a little messed up on
the diff lines.

But, again, my cvs knowledge is not extensive, so I may have screwed
something up.

Joshua.

Reply via email to