Joshua, Thanks for your summary. Have we at least agreed that we want to move to some sort of generated FAQ? If we have then I'll volunteer to have a look at some packages and post some results here. If we haven't reached that point yet then I'm +1 on #1 for the time being as it seems to have the lowest work/results ratio while keeping us moving forward.
david > Okay, after taking a few days break from this issue, here is what I am > willing to do. Anyone who has an interest in this, please let me know > which you prefer: > > 1. Adapt my prototype to the following concerns: > - Add numbering in the indexes > - Remove the "background" section > - Think a little more about what sections should be included and start > with a more complete list > - Figure out some way to make it viewable as a single page > > This would not have the "multi-level hierarchy" that some people have > suggested, even though I agree that would be nice. I'm trying to keep > things simple. > > 2. Keep the current FAQ and just remove most of the questions. Hope that > sometime in the near future, one of the FAQ-O-Matic type systems will be > good enough to replace it, or someone will come up with a better idea. > > 3. Leave it be and let someone else deal with it. > > Votes? > > Joshua. > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >