On Sat, 24 Feb 2001, David Reid wrote: > > If we can do all this then I'll be +1 :), but presently I'm -0.5 on the > sample you created. >
I assume "you" refers to "me". It's good to have more voices in the discussion, but it would be nice to have a little more explanation. You commented on Ken's goals, but didn't make any comments on the actual prototype, or how it fulfills these goals, other than to say you are "-0.5". That's a judgement, but not a explanation. The goals themselves are fine (except for #2 which I still don't understand; nobody has given me actual concrete reasons why it is important... Ken?). In any case, it looks like people prefer to stick to the old FAQ. Joshua.
