From: "Joshua Slive" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, February 24, 2001 12:06 PM
> On Sat, 24 Feb 2001, David Reid wrote: > > > > If we can do all this then I'll be +1 :), but presently I'm -0.5 on the > > sample you created. > > > > I assume "you" refers to "me". > > It's good to have more voices in the discussion, but it would be nice to > have a little more explanation. You commented on Ken's goals, but didn't > make any comments on the actual prototype, or how it fulfills these goals, > other than to say you are "-0.5". That's a judgement, but not a > explanation. The goals themselves are fine (except for #2 which I still > don't understand; nobody has given me actual concrete reasons why it is > important... Ken?). > > In any case, it looks like people prefer to stick to the old FAQ. No... I'd much prefer your organization into appropriate sub-lists. Many people -won't- read a 124kb document - if it's more than a page or two - they get overwhelmed, simply give up and ask the newsgroup. Sad but true. If we want to make two approaches into the doc - using Ken's basic SSI schema, that would be great. But as far as web page navigation - I'd be much happier with a group of pages, with a "Printable" button that takes the user to the "Big Document". Bill
