I was going to suggest that :) Actually I was thinking it... because fpexe was built against libraries on RTR's machine (the people that ported Frontpage to Linux) and I am thinking the recompile now linked it against your libraries on your machine and all happy... maybe?
Glad you got it fixed. -Josh ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ed McLain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Apache Frontpage support list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 5:34 PM Subject: Re: [Apache-FP] Apache-FP over NFS > Ok.. I have no idea why this would fix this problem, but I had this > issue just today after having to reload our main webserver with redhat > 7.2 and reloading the new joshie-fp rpms. In an attempt to get a better > understanding of what was going on with the fpexe app I went into > /usr/local/frontpage/version5.0/apache-fp/ and noticed the fpexe.c > file. I ran gcc fpexe.c and copied the a.out to _vti_bin/fpexe and > voila, the problem disapeared. No idea why or how, but I figured that > might help some of you out. > > > On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 14:12, Joshua Levitsky wrote: > > > From: Jonathan Pickard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Organization: Rackspace Managed Hosting > > > Reply-To: Apache Frontpage support list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Date: 22 Jul 2003 12:12:16 -0500 > > > To: Apache Frontpage support list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Subject: [Apache-FP] Apache-FP over NFS > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > We have Apache-FP up and running with only one problem. Users whose > > > document root resides on an NFS share cannot connect to their FP web. > > > The following is logged in the error_log when such a connection is > > > attempted: > > > > > > [Tue Jul 22 11:52:10 2003] [error] [client 64.39.1.11] malformed header > > > from script. Bad header=<html><head><title>vermeer RPC: > > > /usr/local/frontpage/version5.0/apache-fp/_vti_bin/fpexe > > > > > > I am sure everything was configured properly. When the document root is > > > placed on a local drive the user is able to connect without error. > > > > > > Any suggestions? > > > > Someone posted this... > > > > http://lists.joshie.com/pipermail/apache-fp/2003-February/001934.html > > > > Which was the same issue, but I don't see a reply to that message in the > > archives, but for some reason I remember the issue and it had to do with > > recompiling the fpexec with some flag. I'll try to remember, but if someone > > else here remembers what I'm trying to remember then please post. > > > > -Josh > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Apache-FP mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://lists.joshie.com/mailman/listinfo/apache-fp > > > > Donations: > > http://www.amazon.com/paypage/PT5LZITM9L227 > -- > Thanks, > Ed McLain > Sr. Network Admin > High Speed Solutions > > _______________________________________________ > Apache-FP mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.joshie.com/mailman/listinfo/apache-fp > > Donations: > http://www.amazon.com/paypage/PT5LZITM9L227 > > _______________________________________________ Apache-FP mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.joshie.com/mailman/listinfo/apache-fp Donations: http://www.amazon.com/paypage/PT5LZITM9L227
