2010/4/19 Felipe Sánchez Martínez <fsanc...@dlsi.ua.es>: > > Hi all, > > Prompsit did not go down, why? because the language pairs offered there > are stable and tested. > > I would like to rise a question. Should we offer the translation between > developing language pairs at the webpage? IMHO we shouldn't.
But what's the measure? Released pairs? The ones at apertium.org have all had a release. All language pairs that have reached version 1.0? That's rather arbitrary… All that have had a thorough testvoc? All released pairs _should_ have this. Should one simply let, say, half a year pass before putting a release on the server, to collect bug reports? How many people actually download the language packages, run lots of text through them, and then _report the bugs_? It seems to me like a better solution is to use ScaleMT, and perhaps let those language pairs that we, for whatever reason, consider too untested run on a different server. Unless I completely misunderstood Victor's presentation last fall, using ScaleMT it should be possible to keep the web page going even though one server goes down (do you even need ScaleMT to do that?). Thus developers can get quick feedback on what's wrong (oh, and apertium.org gets to offer more language pairs). Of course, this assumes that there is the possibility of having yet another server… best regards, Kevin Brubeck Unhammer ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Apertium-stuff mailing list Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
