On 19 April 2010 11:45, Kevin Brubeck Unhammer <[email protected]> wrote:
> 2010/4/19 Felipe Sánchez Martínez <[email protected]>:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Prompsit did not go down, why? because the language pairs offered there
>> are stable and tested.
>>
>> I would like to rise a question. Should we offer the translation between
>> developing language pairs at the webpage? IMHO we shouldn't.
>
> But what's the measure? Released pairs? The ones at apertium.org have
> all had a release.

Heck, in some pairs, it was quite an old release. I used to use the
website to check how things came out a year or two ago.

> All language pairs that have reached version 1.0?
> That's rather arbitrary… All that have had a thorough testvoc?  All
> released pairs _should_ have this.

en-gl is, I think, considered 'released' and 'stable', but it clearly
never had a thorough testvoc.


-- 
<Leftmost> jimregan, that's because deep inside you, you are evil.
<Leftmost> Also not-so-deep inside you.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Apertium-stuff mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff

Reply via email to