On 2 April 2011 16:56, Hèctor Alòs i Font <[email protected]> wrote: > 2011/3/31 Jimmy O'Regan <[email protected]> >> >> >> I'm still not sure if displaying all the rules matched along the way >> to a final match is a bug or a feature, so debate among yourselves. >> Interchunk will follow later today. >> > > Useful feature! (especially if we could have a user defined identifier for > the rules and so rules could be easier found - the same could be said for > the compilation feature warning about the blocking of a rule by another.
Well, the rule number is really the only meaningful identifier available. I guess I could get it to also print the line number, but I find that libxml2's idea of a line number tends to be off by quite a bit. > By > the way, it seems to me nonsense and unhelpful to receive zillions of times > the same warning message about a the same pair of rules, even if several > paths are blocked). I've been thinking of changing the compilation thing to only be visible when a switch is selected (probably also -t), because it's something that regular users really should not have to look at. I guess it wouldn't have much negative impact to also cache rule pairs. It's something you'll probably have to remind me about, though, and then at a time when I'm getting sick of staring at something else. > > Even if lots or rules are displayed, I would prefer to have all the > matchings. -- <Leftmost> jimregan, that's because deep inside you, you are evil. <Leftmost> Also not-so-deep inside you. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Create and publish websites with WebMatrix Use the most popular FREE web apps or write code yourself; WebMatrix provides all the features you need to develop and publish your website. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ms-webmatrix-sf _______________________________________________ Apertium-stuff mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
