On 2 April 2011 17:20, Jimmy O'Regan <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 2 April 2011 16:56, Hèctor Alòs i Font <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 2011/3/31 Jimmy O'Regan <[email protected]>
>>>
>>>
>>> I'm still not sure if displaying all the rules matched along the way
>>> to a final match is a bug or a feature, so debate among yourselves.
>>> Interchunk will follow later today.
>>>
>>
>> Useful feature! (especially if we could have a user defined identifier for
>> the rules and so rules could be easier found - the same could be said for
>> the compilation feature warning about the blocking of a rule by another.
>
> Well, the rule number is really the only meaningful identifier
> available. I guess I could get it to also print the line number, but I
> find that libxml2's idea of a line number tends to be off by quite a
> bit.

It seems that Unhammer already includes the line number in the 'rules
blocked' feature - is that useful?

-- 
<Leftmost> jimregan, that's because deep inside you, you are evil.
<Leftmost> Also not-so-deep inside you.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Create and publish websites with WebMatrix
Use the most popular FREE web apps or write code yourself; 
WebMatrix provides all the features you need to develop and 
publish your website. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ms-webmatrix-sf
_______________________________________________
Apertium-stuff mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff

Reply via email to