On 3 April 2011 07:31, Mikel Forcada <m...@dlsi.ua.es> wrote: > On 04/03/2011 03:19 AM, Jimmy O'Regan wrote: >> Characters in CJK >> languages also have phonetic values. Unlikely as it may be, it just >> might work. > How would phonetic values relate to the fact that Apertium > part-of-speech taggers select one of the lexical forms the morphological > analyser produces to a surface form?
That would seem to preclude the use of methods to augment the output of the analyser (suffix based guessing, mapping the observed ambiguity class to a superset and inserting those tags, etc.), which is where I would imagine a phonetic decomposition fitting in. Perhaps the idea description should reflect that. In any case, the point is moot: Chen has said that you were right, that he (she?) had mixed up ASR techniques. > What does phonetics have to do when > we are dealing with written language? > I've often wondered that too - the Xerox users seem to think it has quite a lot to do. -- <Leftmost> jimregan, that's because deep inside you, you are evil. <Leftmost> Also not-so-deep inside you. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Create and publish websites with WebMatrix Use the most popular FREE web apps or write code yourself; WebMatrix provides all the features you need to develop and publish your website. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ms-webmatrix-sf _______________________________________________ Apertium-stuff mailing list Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
