lttoolbox is good for segmental morphology, and better the more agglutinative 
it is.

HFST and related frameworks are better when you have autosegmental morphology: 
You may make one segmental transducer, and a separate transducer for the 
autosegmental morphology, and for complex morphological processes. I did not 
look into bribri, but from what i know about American langguages they are quite 
complex, and you should really look into HFST.

Also, if you want to have your system master the Bribri tones, then HFST etc. 
is a good choice.

Trond.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BlackBerry® DevCon Americas, Oct. 18-20, San Francisco, CA
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rim-devcon-copy2
_______________________________________________
Apertium-stuff mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff

Reply via email to