On Sun, Jul 8, 2012, at 21:38, Jacob Nordfalk wrote:

2012/7/8 Per Tunedal <[1][email protected]>



  Well, I mixed it up even more: I actually thought of
  Apertium-tolk. I
  want a simple interface without all the information in
  Apertium-viewer.


Hey, to me it smells very much like the 'very simple example
client application for the desktop' that Mikel will do...  is
actually a java version
of [2]http://wiki.apertium.org/wiki/Apertium-tolk   :-)

Excellent!


  as an OmegaT user I cannot but agree. In vain I have tried to
  install Apertium Server to call it from OmegaT. An easy way to
  use translations from Apertium in OmegaT would be welcome.

(This installation is on a separate old box running Debian server.)


Thank you for your feedback!!
As technicians and programmers we very often overlook the
problems that non-programmers can run into.
There is way too little of you, our users, that posts about their
problems on the list.

It's a pleasure to contribute.


  There is a great interest in an offline solution because
  professional
  translators translate confidential texts, that cannot be sent
  to e.g.
  Google Translate. Some have managed to set up a local server
  running
  Apertium. Some kind of plug-in would be a much more
  appropriate
  solution.


Aaah... got it.

Would those professional translators actually pay for the work
involved in providing easy to install offline solutions ?   ;-)

That would give some extra long-term possibilies. For example to
look at those pairs that cannot run in pure Java but depend on
external stuff.

Well, yes indeed, I think so. The OmegaT developers usually develop
features they need themselves or get paid for. There are some recent
examples of new features introduced after some private negotiations
between a user and a developer. The procedure starts by a feature
request at the list. A developer then answers that it's possible and
asks the user to contact him in private.

Feel free to explore the opportunities. The usual contacts between users
and developers are made by the user fouum/mailing list:

http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/omegat/

But, keep in mind what Jimmy O'Regan kindly pointed out:
"they should probably make a separate 'Local Apertium' plugin, to not
annoy the OmegaT developers :) "

To be technical (sorry): Apart from the Java solutions we are
working on now I could imagine that we could do a virtual Linux
machine (started from VirtualBox) with all language pairs and
apertium services etc correctly installed which you could use
locally.

And reach the translations from OmegaT?? I have my self such a virtual
Debian installation on a Windows box, but it's of no use for OmegaT.


Jacob

Yours,
Per Tunedal

--snip--

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Apertium-stuff mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff

Reply via email to