Per Tunedal <[email protected]>
writes:

> Hi,
> I've just began to study Norwegian and have two questions about
> pronouns:
>
> 1) Personal pronoun, 3:rd person, masculinum
>
> Both bokmål (nb) and nynorsk (nn) accepts that the subject form is used
> as object form: han - han (instead of han - ham/honom). Does the nn-nb
> module take this into account?

$ echo han ham |lt-proc -we nb-nn.automorf.bin 
^han/han<prn><p3><m><sg><nom>/han<prn><p3><m><sg><acc>$ 
^ham/ham<n><m><sg><ind>/han<prn><p3><m><sg><acc>$

ie. the Bokmål "han" is ambiguous between subject/object, "ham" is
always object (unless it's the noun meaning animal skin/fur).

For nynorsk, only "han" is used for both ('honom' I think would be
considered fairly archaic in Nynorsk).

$ echo Jeg så han|apertium nb-nn
Eg såg han

$ echo Eg såg han|apertium nn-nb
Jeg så ham

The ambiguity in the below example is resolved by the CG.

> BTW Swedish has the same practise in dialects and among many young
> people. But, not in writing, as far as I know. Oh, actually I can see it
> this very day in my morning paper right in front of me! I'm shocked!
>
> 2) Person pronouns, subject form and object form
>
> I have noticed that this is treated differently in the pairs sv-da
> compared to nb-nn and is-sv. In sv-da the personal pronouns in subject
> form are repeated in the bilingual dictionary with a tag for subject and
> object, respectively. In the others 
>
> Why this difference? And what are the implications? Is there a standard
> way in Apertium?

I don't think it matters much in this case. If the input to bidix is

^foo<a><b><c>$

then output of bidix will be

^bar<a><b><c>$

whether bidix contains

<e><p><l>foo<s n="a"/><s n="b"/></l><r>bar<s n="a"/><s n="b"/></r></p></e>

or

<e><p><l>foo<s n="a"/><s n="b"/><s n="c"/></l><r>bar<s n="a"/><s n="b"/><s 
n="c"/></r></p></e>

That is, the longest match in bidix is chosen, and if it doesn't _fully_
match, any other tags are simply carried over unchanged.

The fact that nb-nn uses nom/acc where sv-da uses subj/obj is
unfortunate, but not really a problem, simply do

<e><p><l>foo<s n="a"/><s n="b"/><s n="subj"/></l><r>bar<s n="a"/><s n="b"/><s 
n="nom"/></r></p></e>
<e><p><l>foo<s n="a"/><s n="b"/><s n="obj"/></l><r>bar<s n="a"/><s n="b"/><s 
n="acc"/></r></p></e>

in sv-no.dix

-- 
Kevin Brubeck Unhammer

GPG: 0x766AC60C


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Apertium-stuff mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff

Reply via email to