On 26 October 2012 07:35, Mikel L. Forcada <[email protected]> wrote: > Jim, Apertiumers: > > I think bitextor needs a new release. I know that there was an effort at > Prompsit (Sergio, can you confirm?) to build version 3, a rather complete > rebuild of the system, but was abandoned mid-way. (Jim, you are welcome to > become a developer if you wish).
Aside from that 1-line patch, bitextor worked fine for me. I never tried the rewritten version, because it didn't seem to have any extra features. > At least a quick release with the patch you > sent should be available. If it takes some pressure off someone else, I wouldn't mind doing that. I know I also had some extra models for language identification. > I am copying Miquel Esplà and Sergio Ortiz who can > probably give a more detailed account of the situation. > > I have been in contact with Barry Haddow at the MosesCore FP7 project. They > are also interested in bitextor. I have mentioned the possibility of > assigning a developer to the tool. Sure, it's an interesting tool, and there's plenty of scope for an interested student to try different distance metrics. I had been interested in adding Adam Radziszewski's SRX library, for sentence splitting. -- <Sefam> Are any of the mentors around? <jimregan> yes, they're the ones trolling you ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct _______________________________________________ Apertium-stuff mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
