On 13/05/13 09:31, Tino Didriksen wrote: > And it certainly beats any XML monstrosity, though adding an XML > parser for writing XML grammars would be easy, provided anyone can > come up with a sane XML schema that covers all features of CG. I'm sure a more technical appraisal of the possible advantages on non-XML versus XML formats can be done.
By the way, there is no need to *parse* XML. XML is already parsed and labeled. Mikel -- Mikel L. Forcada (http://www.dlsi.ua.es/~mlf/) Departament de Llenguatges i Sistemes Informàtics Universitat d'Alacant E-03071 Alacant, Spain Phone: +34 96 590 9776 Fax: +34 96 590 9326 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their applications. This 200-page book is written by three acclaimed leaders in the field. The early access version is available now. Download your free book today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/neotech_d2d_may _______________________________________________ Apertium-stuff mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
