El dv 19 de 07 de 2013 a les 19:52 +0100, en/na Jimmy O'Regan va escriure: > On 19 July 2013 17:49, Francis Tyers <[email protected]> wrote: > > One question: > > > > My preference is for lt-comp to parse both the .dix and the AT&T files. > > > > The behaviour would be: > > > > if(fileIsValidXML()) { > > parse_xml > > else if(fileIsValidATT()) { > > parse_att > > } else { > > fail > > } > > > > Would this be ok for people? > > > > * I'd prefer to have the AT&T compiler as part of lt-comp as opposed to > > a separate program. > > * I'd prefer it to work out the file format automatically rather than > > for people to have to specify the format to compile from. > > Er... why? 'lt-comp lr' and 'lt-comp rl' are presumably irrelevant, so > why not make it 'lt-comp att' or whatever else makes sense.
The lr/rl is still relevant for compiling a generator or an analyser... F. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds. Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Apertium-stuff mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
