On 21 September 2013 18:45, Francis Tyers <[email protected]> wrote: > El ds 21 de 09 de 2013 a les 19:29 +0200, en/na Mikel Forcada va > escriure: >> Al 09/21/2013 02:11 PM, En/na Francis Tyers ha escrit: >> > No, basically I'm asking if it can work without specifying the set of >> > coarse tags. >> What would happen if one did not specify the set of coarse tags in the >> HMM tagger? > > The main thing is that it would make it easier to train taggers for use > after CG. For many language pairs, defining the .tsx file is quite > cumbersome if the tagset is large. And with an automatically-defined > tagset, the training does not finish because it is too large.
If you had some tagged text, you could treat tag clustering as word clustering -- delexicalise the text, generate word classes from it (mkcls will do this), and use those as the coarse tags. Here are some scripts to do that: https://github.com/jimregan/tag-clusterer -- <Sefam> Are any of the mentors around? <jimregan> yes, they're the ones trolling you ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ LIMITED TIME SALE - Full Year of Microsoft Training For Just $49.99! 1,500+ hours of tutorials including VisualStudio 2012, Windows 8, SharePoint 2013, SQL 2012, MVC 4, more. BEST VALUE: New Multi-Library Power Pack includes Mobile, Cloud, Java, and UX Design. Lowest price ever! Ends 9/22/13. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=64545871&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Apertium-stuff mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
