El dv 20 de 09 de 2013 a les 18:41 +0800, en/na Gang Chen va escriure:
> 
> 
> 
> 2013/9/20 Mikel L. Forcada <[email protected]>
>         El 20/09/13 12:18, Francis Tyers escribió:
>         
>                 Did he manage to do the "training with no TSX file"
>                 part ?
>         Some of Gang's [CCed] experiments do not use any "forbid"
>         rules. Am I right Gang?   
>         
> Yes, Mikel, the new tagger could work without rules. However, it is
> done by modifying the code (for the experiments), and there is no such
> a option for whether or not to use the rules in the TSX file in the
> command line. 
> 
> 
> I suppose what Fran meant was whether the new tagger supports
> "retraining"? If so, it does :)
> 
> The resources that the LSW tagger needs are the same as those for the
> original HMM tagger. The LSW tagger supports "unsupervised training"
> and "unsupervised retraining", by using the following commands. So,
> for "retraining" the TSX file is not used.
> apertium-tagger -w -t=n DIC CRP TSX TAGGER_DATA
> apertium-tagger -w -r=n CRP TAGGER_DATA

No, basically I'm asking if it can work without specifying the set of
coarse tags.

Fran



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LIMITED TIME SALE - Full Year of Microsoft Training For Just $49.99!
1,500+ hours of tutorials including VisualStudio 2012, Windows 8, SharePoint
2013, SQL 2012, MVC 4, more. BEST VALUE: New Multi-Library Power Pack includes
Mobile, Cloud, Java, and UX Design. Lowest price ever! Ends 9/22/13. 
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=64545871&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Apertium-stuff mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff

Reply via email to