Francis Tyers <[email protected]> writes: > A 2015-02-25 10:38, Tino Didriksen escrigué: >> On 26 September 2014 at 16:04, Tino Didriksen >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> The apertium patch should also be merged, or we'll have a situation >>> where compiled files won't be compatible depending on whether you >>> got apertium from .deb/.rpm or from svn. >> >> Need some action on this. The patch is currently applied to all binary >> builds, and thus they are all incompatible with language data built >> using svn versions. >> >> So let's turn this around: >> >> Is anyone opposed to applying the following patch and bumping Apertium >> to v3.4 to signify a breaking change? >> >> Are there any other breaking changes we can apply while we're at it?
There are many I'd like, but I can't think of any that we actually have patches for … anyone? >> https://svn.code.sf.net/p/apertium/svn/branches/packaging/trunk/apertium/debian/patches/apertium_01_pcre_version.diff >> [1] > > I've fine with applying this. After 22 weeks, 20 hours and 38 minutes[2] with no objections, I guess it's mergable :-) Committed in -r59136; version number bumped to 3.4 in -r59137. [2] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.nlp.apertium/4652/focus=4655 -- Kevin Brubeck Unhammer GPG: 0x766AC60C
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
_______________________________________________ Apertium-stuff mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
