On 2016-03-03 Francis Tyers wrote: > Hmm, Tino points out that the dictionary is not free as it has an NC and > ND
Too bad. I always thought of the Creative Commons License as a free license, but in this case there was a catch. The short description on the copyright page is a bit misleading: It says, in translation, Attribution/No Commerical/No Adaption. As for the first two, I thought that would not be a problem and as for the adaption part, I would assume that if only the entries were included unmodified, that would be okay. If asking them about a change in the license terms, it would probably be a good idea to shortly describe the Apertium project and its usefulness to a wider public. Morten -- Translate Gettext PO-Files With Apertium: http:/mbjnet.dk/slpo/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140 _______________________________________________ Apertium-stuff mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
