A 2016-03-03 20:22, Morten Bo Johansen escrigué: > On 2016-03-03 Francis Tyers wrote: > >> Hmm, Tino points out that the dictionary is not free as it has an NC >> and >> ND > > Too bad. I always thought of the Creative Commons License as a > free license, but in this case there was a catch. The short > description on the copyright page is a bit misleading: It says, > in translation, Attribution/No Commerical/No Adaption. As for > the first two, I thought that would not be a problem and as for > the adaption part, I would assume that if only the entries were > included unmodified, that would be okay. > > If asking them about a change in the license terms, it would > probably be a good idea to shortly describe the Apertium > project and its usefulness to a wider public. >
Yes, please do that :) You can explain that the system is being designed for use in WikiMedia Content Translation, and Kevin has got funding from both Apertium and WikiMedia for this. Fran ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140 _______________________________________________ Apertium-stuff mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
