Thanks, Kevin, but that's really a short description. Is there any explanation in the wiki or elsewhere? Hèctor
El dc., 30 gen. 2019, 11.25, Kevin Brubeck Unhammer <unham...@fsfe.org> va escriure: > Hèctor Alòs i Font <hectoralos-re5jqeeqqe8avxtiumw...@public.gmane.org> > čálii: > > > where can we read > > anything about weight in lttoolbox? > > Put the w attribute on an <e> like > > <e w="2.0"> > > and use > > lt-proc -L1 > > to output only the 1 best weight classes. > > I believe unmarked <e> is the same as <e w="1.0">, and lower is better. > > Use lt-proc -W to show the weights (see lt-proc --help; it's missing > from the manual https://github.com/apertium/lttoolbox/issues/40 ). > > I've been considering turning it on in nno.dix generation, to prefer > forms that have the same upper/lower-case as their lemma. It comes at a > slight cost to compilation time and fst size though (and I compile quite > often …). > _______________________________________________ > Apertium-stuff mailing list > Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff >
_______________________________________________ Apertium-stuff mailing list Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
