El 2019-03-13 09:02, Francis Tyers escribió:
El 2019-03-13 08:28, Sevilay Bayatlı escribió:
Please are there any problem in the applying rules or in rules
themselves for new system (Weighted), I dont see problem with applying
rules but I am not sure if there is problem in rule itself or not
#there
#crisis
============================================================
hay diferencias evidentes=There are evident differences
Weighted: <rule id="37" comment="REGLA: VERB conjugat"> and <rule
id="14" comment="REGLA: NOM ADJ">
output= it #there is evident differences
^verbcj<SV><vblex><pres><p3><sg>{^there<vblex><pres><p3><sg> is$}$
Unweighted:
echo "hay diferencias"| apertium -d . spa-eng-chunker
apertium-transfer: Rule 35 hay<vblex><pri><p3><sg>/there
is<vblex><pri><p3><sg>
apertium-transfer: Rule 1 diferencia<n><f><pl>/difference<n><pl>
apertium-transfer: Rule 114 .<sent>/.<sent>
^Haverhi<SV><vbser><pri><p3><ND>{^there<adv>$
^be<vbser><pri><p3><5>$}$
^nom<SN><f><pl>{^difference<n><3>$}$^punt<sent>{^.<sent>$}$###
Here is your answer:
Your code is doing:
^verbcj<SV><vblex><pres><p3><sg>{^there<vblex><pres><p3><sg> is$}$
The unweighted code is doing:
Oops, I misread:
^Haverhi<SV><vbser><pri><p3><ND>{^there<adv>$ ^be<vbser><pri><p3><5>$}$
This is what it should be outputting.
Fran
_______________________________________________
Apertium-stuff mailing list
Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
