On Mon, Apr 20, 2020, 17:57 Samuel Sloniker <scoopgra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 1. I oppose allowing the Secretary and Treasurer to be the same person. > What's your reasoning for this? -- Jonathan 2. Using additional criteria for tiebreaking could easily turn into a > rigged election. > 3. I believe there should be a court of some sort for handling violations. > See the Bylaw Violation Court in > http://wiki.apertium.org/wiki/User:ScoopGracie/PMC/Proposed_bylaws for an > example > > On Mon, Apr 20, 2020, 13:15 Tino Didriksen <m...@tinodidriksen.com> wrote: > >> I'm proposing overhauling the Apertium Bylaws, and after some fixes and >> refinements by the PMC, it's time to get everyone's input. >> >> PR with comments: https://github.com/apertium/organisation/pull/13 >> >> Current bylaws: http://wiki.apertium.org/wiki/Bylaws >> >> Proposed bylaws: >> https://github.com/apertium/organisation/blob/overhaul/Bylaws.md >> Proposed CLA: >> https://github.com/apertium/organisation/blob/overhaul/CLA-optional.md >> >> Diff: https://github.com/apertium/organisation/pull/13/files >> >> The rationale is laid out in the top PR comment. There are 3 underlying >> tenets: >> - Codify our de facto behavior into de jure language. >> - Ensure all forms of contributions can result in voting rights. >> - Set up for an eventual Apertium legal entity. >> >> Please read the whole thing, and give feedback on the PR so that it is >> kept in one place. >> >> -- Tino Didriksen >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Apertium-stuff mailing list >> Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff >> > _______________________________________________ > Apertium-stuff mailing list > Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff >
_______________________________________________ Apertium-stuff mailing list Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
