Oh I missed what you quoted. I thought you were referring to the court idea.
Now that I understand the Secretary, I'm fine with #1. On Tue, Apr 21, 2020, 09:39 Jonathan Washington < jonathan.n.washing...@gmail.com> wrote: > My understanding is that the Secretary doesn't have much power—mostly just > responsibility. Or, what power are you talking about? > > -- > Jonathan > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2020, 12:36 Samuel Sloniker <scoopgra...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I just don't like giving one group too much power. Maybe I've spent too >> much time studying the US Constitution. 😀 >> >> On Tue, Apr 21, 2020, 08:56 Jonathan Washington < >> jonathan.n.washing...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Apr 20, 2020, 17:57 Samuel Sloniker <scoopgra...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> 1. I oppose allowing the Secretary and Treasurer to be the same person. >>>> >>> >>> What's your reasoning for this? >>> >>> -- >>> Jonathan >>> >>> 2. Using additional criteria for tiebreaking could easily turn into a >>>> rigged election. >>>> 3. I believe there should be a court of some sort for handling >>>> violations. See the Bylaw Violation Court in >>>> http://wiki.apertium.org/wiki/User:ScoopGracie/PMC/Proposed_bylaws for >>>> an example >>>> >>>> On Mon, Apr 20, 2020, 13:15 Tino Didriksen <m...@tinodidriksen.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I'm proposing overhauling the Apertium Bylaws, and after some fixes >>>>> and refinements by the PMC, it's time to get everyone's input. >>>>> >>>>> PR with comments: https://github.com/apertium/organisation/pull/13 >>>>> >>>>> Current bylaws: http://wiki.apertium.org/wiki/Bylaws >>>>> >>>>> Proposed bylaws: >>>>> https://github.com/apertium/organisation/blob/overhaul/Bylaws.md >>>>> Proposed CLA: >>>>> https://github.com/apertium/organisation/blob/overhaul/CLA-optional.md >>>>> >>>>> Diff: https://github.com/apertium/organisation/pull/13/files >>>>> >>>>> The rationale is laid out in the top PR comment. There are 3 >>>>> underlying tenets: >>>>> - Codify our de facto behavior into de jure language. >>>>> - Ensure all forms of contributions can result in voting rights. >>>>> - Set up for an eventual Apertium legal entity. >>>>> >>>>> Please read the whole thing, and give feedback on the PR so that it is >>>>> kept in one place. >>>>> >>>>> -- Tino Didriksen >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Apertium-stuff mailing list >>>>> Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net >>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Apertium-stuff mailing list >>>> Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Apertium-stuff mailing list >>> Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Apertium-stuff mailing list >> Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff >> > _______________________________________________ > Apertium-stuff mailing list > Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff >
_______________________________________________ Apertium-stuff mailing list Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
