Again, I believe the PMC should not be involved in removing Committer access, even temporarily. I think a separate elected group should do that.
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 12:45 PM Tino Didriksen <m...@tinodidriksen.com> wrote: > It's been a week since last comment on the PR. Everyone is happy with how > the new Bylaws look now? > > If you haven't already, please take the time to read through the current > wording and comments. > > -- Tino Didriksen > > > On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 at 22:14, Tino Didriksen <m...@tinodidriksen.com> > wrote: > >> I'm proposing overhauling the Apertium Bylaws, and after some fixes and >> refinements by the PMC, it's time to get everyone's input. >> >> PR with comments: https://github.com/apertium/organisation/pull/13 >> >> Current bylaws: http://wiki.apertium.org/wiki/Bylaws >> >> Proposed bylaws: >> https://github.com/apertium/organisation/blob/overhaul/Bylaws.md >> Proposed CLA: >> https://github.com/apertium/organisation/blob/overhaul/CLA-optional.md >> >> Diff: https://github.com/apertium/organisation/pull/13/files >> >> The rationale is laid out in the top PR comment. There are 3 underlying >> tenets: >> - Codify our de facto behavior into de jure language. >> - Ensure all forms of contributions can result in voting rights. >> - Set up for an eventual Apertium legal entity. >> >> Please read the whole thing, and give feedback on the PR so that it is >> kept in one place. >> >> -- Tino Didriksen >> >> _______________________________________________ > Apertium-stuff mailing list > Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff >
_______________________________________________ Apertium-stuff mailing list Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
