That actually seems like a useful service the RIRs can provide. Any stats on effectiveness? That is, when APNIC facilitation of abuse contacts results in resolution?
Out of curiosity, do any other RIRs have a similar service? Thanks, -drc > On Apr 25, 2020, at 9:01 PM, Vivek Nigam <[email protected]> wrote: > > Jordi is correct. You can report unresponsive IRT contacts by emailing the > details to [email protected] > > Any supporting information such as the bounce message or details of the email > you sent that did not get a response will assist us in processing the > escalation. > > Thanks > Vivek > > On 26/4/20, 4:14 am, "[email protected] on behalf of David > Conrad" <[email protected] on behalf of > [email protected]> wrote: > > Hmm. > > "Invalid recipient” would appear to suggest the email (regardless of what > language it is in) would not reach anyone, no? > > Regards, > -drc > >> On Apr 24, 2020, at 7:21 PM, Scott Weeks <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> --- [email protected] wrote: >> <snipt> >> >> The China Telecom abuse email "[email protected]" does not work. >> I get a 550 invalid recipient. There is no response from Korea Telecom's >> abuse email. >> >> Anyone have any suggestions on how to get them to respond? >> ------------------------------------------------ >> >> >> >> Did you sent it to them in their native language? >> >> scott >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> apnic-talk mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/apnic-talk >> >> _______________________________________________ >> apnic-talk mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/apnic-talk > > _______________________________________________ > apnic-talk mailing list > [email protected] > https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/apnic-talk > _______________________________________________ apnic-talk mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/apnic-talk
