You mention that this is an attempt by suspended CEO to get his Director appointed through ATU? Any evidence avaiable? Or is it allegations or conjecture? Or hearsay?
For important/ specialized posts involving many countries, recommendations of names from recogonised bodies as a means of giving options with details to the court is normal practice. The court is free to decide. So what's wrong with that? Now coming to more allegations-: Paul is trying to fool the community? How? I am a bottom up community member. I dont find anything in Paul's mail fooling? APNIC community and others at large have put faith in him that's why he is DG of APNIC. How can you question the APNIC Community and The EC of not doing their due diligence? I think your problem lies elsewhere. Unsubstantiated allegations and wild statements are being bandied about as a smokescreen. Perhar On Mon, 22 Aug 2022, 14:29 pure kair, <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear Paul > > "As the court is entirely free to accept or reject any of these > candidates, this does not in any way represent an appointment BY the ATU. " > > > > THIS IS ATTEMPT BY SUSPENDED CEO OF RIR TO APPOINT DIRECTOR BY ATU TO GET > BACK HIS PERSONAL POWER. > > > > As such power lie on the court to make the final decision does not in any > way deny the fact of the suspended CEO of RIR trying to appoint director > through ATU. > > > > Paul, please do not mislead the community and take the community as fools. > > > > I am a community driven bottom up guy, for me, if you want to go down that > route, you may as well resign and serve the governmental bodies. Don't try > to turn APNIC into one. > > > > > On Thu, 18 Aug 2022 at 14:07, Paul Wilson <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Dear friends and colleagues, >> >> I do understand the interest by members of the APNIC community in the >> letter from the NRO to the government of Mauritius, dated on 12 July. >> Accordingly, I provided background and explanation of this action in an >> APNIC blogpost on 22 July: >> >> https://blog.apnic.net/2022/07/22/why-the-nro-is-defending-afrinic/ >> >> As explained in this blogpost, the primary reason for the NRO’s >> correspondence was to highlight the risks to the global Internet operations >> from unintended consequences of decisions made by the Mauritian courts, in >> the course of recent legal proceedings. The letter was a product of the NRO >> and it expressed the NRO’s commonly held concerns about the potential for >> serious damage to important Internet operations, a matter which is of >> common concern to all RIRs and, we believe, of great importance to all RIR >> communities. >> >> A secondary reason for the correspondence was to express support for >> AFRINIC’s previous requests to Mauritius for recognition of its status as >> an international organisation. Whether such recognition is granted and what >> this process entails under Mauritian law, are matters for the discretion of >> the Mauritian Government and for AFRINIC. However it should be noted that >> LACNIC has held a similar status for many years in its host country of >> Uruguay, as one of numerous organisations in the same category. >> >> Finally, regarding the process for AFRINIC Board appointments, which were >> not mentioned in the NRO letter or my blog post: my understanding is that >> if ANY Mauritian company becomes unable to complete its usual board >> appointment or election process, the Mauritian courts have discretion to >> appoint board members in order to allow the company to function. >> >> In AFRINIC’s case, the court was provided with a list of suggested >> candidate names, which had been solicited from the ATU (African >> Telecommunications Union) as a recognised independent and authoritative >> body, and along with other names from other sources (to my understanding). >> As the court is entirely free to accept or reject any of these candidates, >> this does not in any way represent an appointment BY the ATU. Under the >> current circumstances this appears to be an entirely legitimate process to >> enable the AFRINIC board to function and convene elections in accordance >> with their by-laws. >> >> I hope that these answers are useful and informative to interested >> parties. >> >> Paul. >> ------------------------------ >> >> Paul Wilson, Director-General, APNIC [email protected] >> http://www.apnic.net @apnicdg >> _______________________________________________ >> apnic-talk - https://mailman.apnic.net/[email protected]/ >> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > > _______________________________________________ > apnic-talk - https://mailman.apnic.net/[email protected]/ > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
_______________________________________________ apnic-talk - https://mailman.apnic.net/[email protected]/ To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
