Hi Christopher, I wish to reiterate my prior assertions (yet again) that our comprehension of Paul's imminent designation as a non-voting director, aligned with the imperative to fulfill Australia's resident directors stipulation, remains steadfast. However, please take note that my current proposition urges APNIC to augment transparency by divulging the pertinent corporate secretarial documents that would substantiate this arrangement and dispel potential uncertainties.
I MUST emphasize and it is imperative to underscore that this communication is exclusively intended as constructive feedback and a well-considered suggestion for APNIC's contemplation. I find myself somewhat perplexed by the opposing viewpoints exhibited by certain members, as our objective here is to collectively provide constructive feedbacks and suggestions to APNIC, ultimately for the benefit of the members. Furthermore, I feel compelled to address an additional matter: the misconception that we are unfairly singling out Paul. I invite a thorough review of my earlier input, which should clarify that our concern pertains to the broader context of transparency and legal compliance, rather than any individual focus. Thanks. JJ Yap LARUS Limited _______________________________________________ APNIC-talk - https://mailman.apnic.net/apnic-talk@lists.apnic.net/ To unsubscribe send an email to apnic-talk-le...@lists.apnic.net
