JJ, The "corporate secretarial documents that would substantiate this arrangement" can be purchased from https://www.asic.gov.au/ for a nominal fee of $10 AUD. They accept Visa and Mastercard.
Your communications are not "exclusively intended as constructive feedback and a well-considered suggestion", rather it is the ideology of one "Associate" member who holds no resources within the APNIC service region, thankfully to some well designed policies. LARUS is in my view unfairly singling out Paul Wilson, without a justifiable (or even a logical) reason. You and others affiliated with LARUS has been provided on countless occasions all the relevant information (all of it public by the way) which demonstrates legal compliance. LARUS needs to, although they won't and have demonstrated never will, drop the thought process that Paul is the sole authority within APNIC as it's simply not the case. If anything, he ought to be commended for his contribution to internet governance throughout the years, and deserves public recognition. Regards, Christopher H. ________________________________ From: JJ <j....@larus.net> Sent: Friday, August 11, 2023 9:16 PM To: apnic-talk@lists.apnic.net <apnic-talk@lists.apnic.net> Subject: [apnic-talk] Re: Feedback on APNIC proposed By-law reforms Hi Christopher, I wish to reiterate my prior assertions (yet again) that our comprehension of Paul's imminent designation as a non-voting director, aligned with the imperative to fulfill Australia's resident directors stipulation, remains steadfast. However, please take note that my current proposition urges APNIC to augment transparency by divulging the pertinent corporate secretarial documents that would substantiate this arrangement and dispel potential uncertainties. I MUST emphasize and it is imperative to underscore that this communication is exclusively intended as constructive feedback and a well-considered suggestion for APNIC's contemplation. I find myself somewhat perplexed by the opposing viewpoints exhibited by certain members, as our objective here is to collectively provide constructive feedbacks and suggestions to APNIC, ultimately for the benefit of the members. Furthermore, I feel compelled to address an additional matter: the misconception that we are unfairly singling out Paul. I invite a thorough review of my earlier input, which should clarify that our concern pertains to the broader context of transparency and legal compliance, rather than any individual focus. Thanks. JJ Yap LARUS Limited _______________________________________________ APNIC-talk - https://mailman.apnic.net/apnic-talk@lists.apnic.net/ To unsubscribe send an email to apnic-talk-le...@lists.apnic.net
_______________________________________________ APNIC-talk - https://mailman.apnic.net/apnic-talk@lists.apnic.net/ To unsubscribe send an email to apnic-talk-le...@lists.apnic.net
