I don't believe it's appropriate for an organisation involved in litigation with an RIR from a different service region, to come into a discussion about proposed by-law amendments in another (especially when one of the proposals sets a restriction of preventing an organisation in current litigation with APNIC from joining the EC and subsequently becoming a director).
The "advises and constructive feedbacks" offered I believe is not genuine for the reasons I've previously mentioned. Even if it was and I was brushing it off, this does not constitute a personal attack. IP resources need not have once belonged to someone for the current holder to be called out for exploitation of those resources. Cloud Innovation and LARUS obtained these resources, with the sole intention of using them (and currently using them), outside of the AFRINIC service region. This is demonstrable through route views into resources held by Cloud Innovation. It's clear Cloud Innovation had and has no intention of using them within the AFRINIC service region. While Cloud Innovation's current litigation with AFRINIC did indeed take place outside of the APNIC service region, the litigation nonetheless is against an RIR that in essence performs the same functions as APNIC. So it is indeed very relevant. Regards, Christopher H. ________________________________ From: Hubert <h....@larus.net> Sent: Friday, August 11, 2023 11:09 PM To: apnic-talk@lists.apnic.net <apnic-talk@lists.apnic.net> Subject: [apnic-talk] Re: Feedback on APNIC proposed By-law reforms Dear Mr. Hawker, With all due respect you have let your ego gets in the way and digressed way too far from our original topic, the goal that we strive to achieve here is to make known to you all, higher up on the pedestal, what change does the member truly yearn for in the community, in hoping that the EC could listen to us better in addressing concerns we always have. However, looking at the series of personal attacks you launched at us by brushing off our genuine advises and constructive feedbacks and even went as far as calling us out for exploiting resources that never once belonged to you in the first place? Who are you to be policing our actions when the matter happened outside of APNIC region and still pending final determination of the apex court of the Mauritius? Regards, Hubert _______________________________________________ APNIC-talk - https://mailman.apnic.net/apnic-talk@lists.apnic.net/ To unsubscribe send an email to apnic-talk-le...@lists.apnic.net
_______________________________________________ APNIC-talk - https://mailman.apnic.net/apnic-talk@lists.apnic.net/ To unsubscribe send an email to apnic-talk-le...@lists.apnic.net
