Glen:

        My glee at the minimal captures of Apple Maggot on this farm is 
tempered by my history of Lesser Appleworm.  It has produced significant
damage to fruit when I have omitted insecticide in August.  Now I am thinking 
that LAW traps may be needed to justify the insecticide.

David Kollas
Kollas Orchard
Tolland, CT


On Aug 5, 2013, at 8:35 AM, Glen Koehler <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Art
>     See paragraph in last newsletter.  Bottom line is sugar should also 
> increase efficacy of Assail and possibly Delegate against AM but nobody knows 
> if there would be other problems created by spraying sugar on apples.  I find 
> the slow start to AM catches perplexing.  Only speculation I have to explain 
> it is that they suffered high mortality in winter.  But that might be wishful 
> thinking.  Next few weeks will tell.
> - Glen
> 
> On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 8:45 AM, Arthur Kelly <[email protected]> wrote:
> There is a recommendation to add sugar when making an application of Assail 
> for SWD on berries to stimulate feeding.  1-2 lbs per hundred gal.  What 
> about for apples when using Assail or Delegate for instance?  My 
> understanding is that when first emerged the flies feed.  FYI we trapped the 
> first AM fly on 8/2 here.  Only one on five traps.
> 
> Art Kelly
> Kelly Orchards
> Acton, ME
> 
> 
> On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 1:33 PM, David Kollas <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
>       Thank you, Art.  It is always better to know whether the most-informed 
> have the answers; or whether, instead, they are not sure either.
> 
>       The uncertainty that Reissig expressed in his paper of 2003 apparently 
> continues now ten years later. In that paper he indicated the need for 
> additional research to assess practical aspects of replacing organophosphates 
> with newer chemistries in commercial orchards.
> 
>       A practical aspect of using Calyso or Assail in leu of Imidan that is 
> separate from their mode of action on Apple Maggot, is the 
> question of how to incorporate them into a label-compliant 
> resistance-management program that includes control of many pests in addition 
> to Apple Maggot. 
> 
> David
> 
> 
>  
> On Aug 2, 2013, at 11:53 AM, Arthur M. Agnello wrote:
> 
>> Hi David,
>> 
>> Harvey Reissig did a study on the efficacy of some of the newer products 
>> against apple maggot, and published it some years ago: 
>> 
>> Reissig, W. Harvey.  2003.  Field and Laboratory Tests of New Insecticides 
>> Against the Apple Maggot, Rhagoletis pomonella (Walsh) (Diptera: 
>> Tephritidae).   Journal of Economic Entomology 96 (5): 1463-1472 — I will 
>> send you a pdf of it in a separate email.  
>> 
>> However, his general findings were that there are no new insecticides that 
>> are as effective in controlling AM as the organophosphates, particularly in 
>> “high pressure situations”.  It is also true that most of the new materials 
>> are not as directly toxic to the flies as the OPs, and the efficacy of many 
>> these new materials appears to be due to their ability to prevent flies from 
>> ovipositing as long as they are in contact with their residues.  We really 
>> don’t know the mechanism of this mode of action, but in many laboratory 
>> bioassays the flies will not lay eggs on treated apples, although they 
>> remain alive.  So far, we would say that in most normal US orchards, which 
>> are presumed to be initially free from internal AM infestations and are not 
>> near abandoned orchards and other large sources of unsprayed host trees, we 
>> have not seen control failures or even increased damage in orchards that are 
>> not treated with organophosphates, although AM catches in monitoring traps 
>> placed along the edges of these orchards appears to  be higher than when 
>> they were sprayed with organophosphates.
>> 
>> As far as efficacy, Calypso is definitely the most effective of the new 
>> insecticides, followed by Assail.  Delegate and Altacor also have some 
>> activity, but would probably not provide control in orchards with internal 
>> infestations or those that are near heavy unsprayed sources of infestations.
>> 
>> Art
>> 
>> --
>> Arthur M. Agnello
>> Professor and Extension Tree Fruit Entomologist
>> Dept. of Entomology                            [email protected]
>> N.Y.S. Agric. Expt. Sta.                        Tel: 315-787-2341
>> 630 W. North St.                                   Fax: 315-787-2326
>> Geneva, NY  14456-1371  
>> http://web.entomology.cornell.edu/agnello/links.html
>> Scaffolds Fruit Journal online:
>> http://www.scaffolds.entomology.cornell.edu/index.html
>> 
>> From: Dave Kollas <[email protected]>
>> Reply-To: Apple-crop discussion list <[email protected]>
>> Date: Fri, Aug 2 10:44 AM
>> To: Apple-crop discussion list <[email protected]>
>> Subject: Re: [apple-crop] Residual pesticide activity
>> 
>> 
>> Thank you for that, Peter.
>> 
>> I suppose that if the systemic activity of neonics is sufficient to kill 
>> Apple Maggot eggs or larvae during a (two week?) period after application, 
>> and  up to 2 inches rainfall, they could be expected to be as good as Imidan 
>> or Guthion, regardless of whether the adults are killed by fruit or foliar 
>> contact.
>> Or, perhaps female flies are killed by ovipositor contact with systemic 
>> neonic during egg insertion?  My guess is that such studies have not been 
>> made.
>> 
>> David Kollas
>> 
>> On Aug 2, 2013, at 8:55 AM, Peter J. Jentsch wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi David,
>>> 
>>> John Wise, Michigan State University, Department of Entomology, wrote a 
>>> very nice piece on the 'Rainfast characteristics of fruit crop 
>>> insecticides'  that might help to answer these questions. It was posted on 
>>> June 3, 2013.
>>> 
>>> http://msue.anr.msu.edu/news/rainfast_characteristics_of_fruit_crop_insecticides
>>> 
>>> All the best,
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Peter J. Jentsch
>>> Senior Extension Associate - Entomology
>>> Department of Entomology
>>> Cornell University’s Hudson Valley  Lab
>>> P.O. Box 727, 3357 Rt. 9W
>>> Highland, NY 12528
>>> 
>>> Office: 845-691-7151
>>> Cell: 845-417-7465
>>> FAX: 845-691-2719
>>> 
>>> E-mail: [email protected]
>>> http://hudsonvf.cce.cornell.edu/bmsb1.html
>>> http://web.entomology.cornell.edu/jentsch/links.html
>>> From: [email protected] 
>>> [[email protected]] on behalf of David Kollas 
>>> [[email protected]]
>>> Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2013 8:50 PM
>>> To: [email protected]
>>> Subject: [apple-crop] Fwd: Residual pesticide activity
>>> 
>>> Perhaps the sending address I used this morning was wrong.  I am trying 
>>> another now.
>>> 
>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>> 
>>>> From: David Kollas <[email protected]>
>>>> Date: July 31, 2013 9:08:52 AM EDT
>>>> To: Apple-crop discussion list <[email protected]>
>>>> Bcc: Kollas David <[email protected]>
>>>> Subject: Residual pesticide activity
>>>> 
>>>> All:
>>>> Surely others know the answer to this question. I must have missed it 
>>>> somewhere.  Does the systemic activity of
>>>> absorbed neonicotinoid sprays Assail and Calypso replace the surface 
>>>> residual that continues to kill Apple Maggot flies 
>>>> entering an Imidan or Guthion-treated orchard days after the application?  
>>>> Do the neonics provide residual control only by
>>>> systemic tissue-presence which the insect must consume?  Or do Apple 
>>>> Maggot flies get enough active ingredient through 
>>>> their "feet" to kill them on days-old neonic treatments?  
>>>> The question is relevant in choosing whether, and what pesticide to apply 
>>>> prior to forecast thunderstorms that can 
>>>> remove surface residues.
>>>> 
>>>> David Kollas
>>>> Kollas Orchard, Tolland, CT
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> apple-crop mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://virtualorchard.net/mailman/listinfo/apple-crop
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> apple-crop mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://virtualorchard.net/mailman/listinfo/apple-crop
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> apple-crop mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://virtualorchard.net/mailman/listinfo/apple-crop
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Art Kelly
> Kelly Orchards
> Acton, ME
> 
> _______________________________________________
> apple-crop mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://virtualorchard.net/mailman/listinfo/apple-crop
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Glen Koehler
> University of Maine Cooperative Extension
> Pest Management Office
> Voice:  207-581-3882
> 491 College Avenue, Orono, ME  04473 
> _______________________________________________
> apple-crop mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://virtualorchard.net/mailman/listinfo/apple-crop

_______________________________________________
apple-crop mailing list
[email protected]
http://virtualorchard.net/mailman/listinfo/apple-crop

Reply via email to