Preethi, Naeem, David, thank you for stepping up!
I propose that you start off brainstorming a rough structure for the document, such that the WG can see if all relevant aspects are addressed. We would like to reserve a large chunk of the upcoming meeting time to discuss this 2nd milestone document, after discussing the latest changes to http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-aqm-recommendation/ Best regards, Richard Scheffenegger > -----Original Message----- > From: aqm [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Preethi Natarajan > Sent: Mittwoch, 08. Jänner 2014 21:53 > To: Wesley Eddy; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [aqm] WG status > > > > On 1/8/14 11:45 AM, "Wesley Eddy" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > - Submit AQM algorithm evaluation guidelines to IESG for publication > >as Informational (Goal: July 2014) > > - We need an editor team to step forward and begin work on this; > >there was initial work presented in Vancouver, but no draft available > >or adopted by the working group yet. > > - It will be difficult to make this milestone, and will push other > >milestones back, if this work isn't accelerated. > > - Please express interest to the chairs or on-list > > > Interested in contributing towards the evaluation guidelines draft -- > write, edit, whatever else is needed to meet deadline. > > Thanks, > Preethi (on behalf of PIE team) > > > > _______________________________________________ > aqm mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm _______________________________________________ aqm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm
