Dear all, On the behalf of the contributors to the AQM Evaluation Guidelines, I encourage active discussion on the draft that we have written. I just submitted the draft as an individual draft to the I-D Submission Tool [0].
Please let us know what you think of the current document. Kind regards, Nicolas KUHN [0] http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kuhn-aqm-eval-guidelines/ On Feb 5, 2014, at 10:01 PM, "Scheffenegger, Richard" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > a new month, a new status report. > > First of all, Wes and I as chairs would like to thank the editors who have > stepped forward to work on the AQM Evaluation Guideline draft. We are really > thankful for their burst of efforts in the last couple weeks! > > We expect that that a document will be ready for submission into the I-D > repository well before cutoff, as an individual draft, so that the WG can see > what the state of thinking is currently. Also, once the document is published > on datatracker we'd like to encourage active discussion on it. > > If the submitted -00 draft is felt to have a fairly complete outline of what > the current thinking in the WG is, we may be able to ask the WG for formal > adoption during this IETF meeting, or shortly thereafter. > > > > > - WG Milestones: > - Submit AQM recommendations to IESG for publication, obsoleting RFC > 2309 (Goal: January 2014) > - draft-ietf-aqm-recommendation is accepted towards this milestone > - http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-aqm-recommendation/ > - the draft has been updated per comments received > - if the authors are comfortable, a WGLC might be made on the next > revision > - we would like to hear from other authors of RFC 2309 on this > document, if anyone has contacts to them. > > > - Submit AQM algorithm evaluation guidelines to IESG for publication as > Informational (Goal: July 2014) > - An editor team has come forth and is working on this > - A draft should be available for discussion in the London IETF > - We encourage discussion on the list and during the meeting, if this > draft should be adopted by the working group. > > - Submit first algorithm specification to IESG for publication as > Proposed Standard (Goal: December 2014) > - Since any Proposed Standard algorithm should be in line with the > recommendations and be passable versus the evaluation guidelines, this > milestone is dependend on the progress of the two work items above. > - Currently the only algorithm spec with a complete and active > individual-submission draft is PIE > > - Other items: > - draft-pan-aqm-pie is under active work as a proposed algorithm: > http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-pan-aqm-pie-00.txt, however the draft > has expired and should be refreshed. > - draft-nichols-tsvwg-codel is expired; Dave Taht or others may revive it > and/or > describe pairing with FQ/SFQ algorithms: > http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-nichols-tsvwg-codel-01.txt > - Other algorithm specifications are welcome! > - Though, we are not planning on adopting algorithms until > recommendations and evaluation guidelines are mostly stable > > > Richard Scheffenegger > > _______________________________________________ > aqm mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm _______________________________________________ aqm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm
