A new version (draft-ietf-aqm-docsis-pie-02) has been uploaded that addresses the idnits.
Thanks, Greg On 2/4/16, 4:26 PM, "aqm on behalf of Greg White" <aqm-boun...@ietf.org on behalf of g.wh...@cablelabs.com> wrote: >Thanks Wes. I should be able to get those taken care of in the next week or >so. > >-Greg > > > > >On 2/4/16, 11:33 AM, "aqm on behalf of Wesley Eddy" <aqm-boun...@ietf.org on >behalf of w...@mti-systems.com> wrote: > >>Since none of the questions outstanding from WGLC seem to impact the >>DOCSIS PIE draft directly, I think that it is ready to move forward: >>https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-aqm-docsis-pie/ >> >>Since it's describing what has already been done in DOCSIS, the >>Informational status seems appropriate, and consistent with other >>similar RFCs, so I think we're good there. >> >>There are some small editorial nits found by "idnits" that we need to >>correct (add a security considerations section, add an IANA >>considerations section, and split references section into >>normative/informative): >>https://www.ietf.org/tools/idnits?url=https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-aqm-docsis-pie-01.txt >> >>I think that is all that needs to be done. >> >> >> >> >>On 1/22/2016 10:01 AM, Wesley Eddy wrote: >>> Hello; the working group last call on the PIE drafts generated some >>> emails, but I don't think I've seen any response from the editors. >>> Specifically, there were a couple of emails with algorithm description >>> questoins and technical comments from Rasool Al-Saadi and Ilpo >>> Jarvinen, both with specific points that should be addressed. >>> >>> For the most part, as I understand the comments, these are things that >>> can be relatively simply fixed up or the intent clarified, and not >>> catastrophic issues that would prevent the PIE docs from being >>> publishable. Please correct me if I misunderstand though. >>> >>> If the editors can respond and work up a revision that addresses the >>> comments to the satisfaction of Rasool and Ilpo, I'd like to keep the >>> PIE documents moving forward. >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> aqm mailing list >>> aqm@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm >>> >>> >> >>_______________________________________________ >>aqm mailing list >>aqm@ietf.org >>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm >_______________________________________________ >aqm mailing list >aqm@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm _______________________________________________ aqm mailing list aqm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm
